Seasonal differences in rainfall,food availability,and the foraging behavior of Tropical Kingbirds in the southern Amazon Basin

ABSTRACT Little is known about the relationship between seasonal food availability and the foraging strategies of insectivorous Neotropical birds. We studied a population of Tropical Kingbirds (Tyrannus melancholicus), a primarily insectivorous species, in eastern Bolivia to examine relationships between rainfall, food availability, and foraging strategies throughout the year. Our study site in the southern Amazon Basin was characterized by strong seasonal variation in the abundance of the kingbird's main insect prey (coleopterans and hymenopterans), with reduced abundance during the nonbreeding season which largely overlaps the dry season. Overall, mean search times for insect prey by Tropical Kingbirds during the breeding (96.9 ± 85.6 [SD] sec) and nonbreeding (83.7 ± 91.2 sec) seasons did not differ (P= 0.23). However, during the nonbreeding season, kingbird search times were negatively, but nonsignificantly, correlated with coleopteran abundance (r²= 0.43, P= 0.16) and significantly and negatively correlated with hymenopteran abundance (r²= 0.72, P= 0.03). Although insect abundance differed seasonally, kingbird search times did not, perhaps because kingbirds forage on a greater variety of insects during the nonbreeding season or, during the breeding season, kingbird search times may be influenced by the need to monitor and defend nests as well as constraints on the types of prey that can be fed to nestlings. However, the reduced abundance of their primary insect prey and negative relationships between the abundance of those prey and search times during the dry, nonbreeding season suggest that Tropical Kingbirds in southern Amazonia may be food limited, potentially explaining why some migrate and spend that season elsewhere.     

Low frequency of observed cowbird parasitism on eastern kingbirds: host rejection, effective nest defense, or parasite avoidance?

Eastern kingbird (Tyrannus tyrannus) nests rarely are parasitizedby brown-headed cowbirds (Molotrus ater). Kingbirds are oneof a dozen or so species known to eject cowbird eggs from theirnests. We hypothesized that either kingbirds eject cowbird eggsso quickly that researchers normally do not detect the eggsduring daily nest inspections, or that cowbirds avoid parasitizingkingbirds. We tested these alternative hypotheses by experimentallyintroducing real cowbird eggs into eastern kingbird nests duringthe pre-egg, early laying, late laying, and incubation stages.We recorded the interval between "parasitism" and ejection ofthe cowbird eggs. Although kingbirds ejected 87 of 88 cowbirdeggs placed in their nests, about 40% of the eggs remained innests for more than 24 h. Thus, during daily nest inspectionswe should have observed cowbird eggs if nests were parasitizedat all. In fact, we detected only one parasitized nest amongthe 402 inspected daily. The time for ejection was longest atnests parasitized early in laying, and shorter at nests parasitizedbefore and after. This variation in ejection times may reflectthe time kingbirds require to learn to recognize their own eggs.Although kingbirds defend their nests aggressively, they donot respond to female cowbirds as unique threats and do notguard their nests before sunrise when cowbirds lay. We concludethat cowbirds avoid parasitizing eastern kingbirds because theireggs most likely will be wasted. The rejection behavior persistspossibly because it is almost cost-free (a maximum of 0.07 kingbirdegg lost or damaged per cowbird egg ejected), or it evolvedin response to conspecific rather than cowbird parasitism. Foreignkingbird eggs introduced into nests at different nest stageswere ejected only during the pre-egg stage. This result supportsthe hypothesis that rejection behavior in eastern kingbirdsevolved in response to cowbird parasitism.     

Age- and sex-dependent spring arrival dates of Eastern Kingbirds

ABSTRACT.   Among migratory passerines, the first birds to arrive on the breeding grounds are usually older males. Early arrival by older birds may be driven by experience, age-dependent changes in body condition, age-dependent access to resources during the nonbreeding period, or latitudinal segregation by age. Males may arrive earlier than females (protandry) because males maintain better condition due to greater access to resources during the winter, or because selection favors early arriving males that acquire the best territories or experience enhanced mating opportunities. During a 4-yr study (2004–2007) in Oregon, we found that older Eastern Kingbirds ( Tyrannus tyrannus ), regardless of sex, arrived nearly a week before younger birds and that males arrived about 5 d before females. Age- and sex-dependent arrival dates do not appear to be related to differences in body condition, social dominance in winter, or latitudinal segregation, and protandry is unrelated to the ability of early-arriving males to acquire high-quality territories. Instead, we propose that young birds have less to gain from early arrival because of their probable inability to displace experienced birds from prime territories and that protandry evolved due to enhanced mating opportunities for early arriving males that arise from the high rates of extra-pair matings in our population of Eastern Kingbirds.     

Using complementary approaches to estimate survival of juvenile and adult Eastern Kingbirds

ABSTRACT Survival rates of young birds during the period between nest departure and their first breeding season is an important but difficult statistic to measure because of low natal site fidelity, especially for long‐distance migrants. From 2002 to 2008, we conducted a capture‐mark‐resight study of Eastern Kingbirds (Tyrannus tyrannus), a Nearctic‐Neotropical migrant, at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon, to estimate juvenile (S_J) and adult (S_A) survival. The return rate of juvenile kingbirds was high (0.224) and not significantly different from program MARK's estimate of S_J (0.291). On average, and for both sexes, program MARK's estimate of S_A for birds banded as nestlings (0.64) was similar to that for birds first banded as adults (0.65). Enumeration methods and MARK yielded similar estimates of S_A, especially for males banded as adults. We attribute the similarity of resighting rate of birds banded as nestlings to S_J and the similarity of S_A estimated using program MARK and by enumeration methods to the high site fidelity of most juvenile and adult kingbirds at our ecologically isolated study site. An independent estimate of S_J calculated using local estimates of population growth and average annual production of young per year suggested that true S_J and S_A were probably slightly higher than program MARK's estimates because of undocumented permanent emigration, especially of birds first banded as adults. Demographic balancing suggests that true S_A and S_J were roughly 0.70 and 0.30, respectively. In general, our multiple estimates of S_J were similar. However, program MARK estimates of S_J tended to be lower than those produced by demographic balancing. Because of the difficulty in differentiating permanent emigration and mortality, and the affect it has on empirical estimates of survival, we urge researchers to use multiple methods of survival estimation, when possible, to validate the precision of their estimates.     

Extrapair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in a socially monogamous passerine

Effects of alternate mating strategies on the opportunity forsexual selection are widely debated, and recent studies haveconcluded that the effects of extrapair (EP) paternity on theopportunity for sexual selection may have been overstated dueto 1) methodological limitations of empirical studies and 2)the potential for males to gain from additional within-pair(WP) reproductive opportunities. We therefore examined the impactof EP paternity on the opportunity for sexual selection in thesocially monogamous and single-brooded eastern kingbird (Tyrannustyrannus). EP paternity was common in all 3 years of our study(61% of 89 broods, 47% of nestlings) and realized reproductivesuccess (EP + WP young) ranged from 0 to 9 young/male/year.A total of 31% of males lost all WP paternity (24% sired neitherWP nor EP young, whereas 7% sired EP but not WP young), andvariance in male realized reproductive success was more than9 times greater than that of apparent reproductive success.Nearly half of EP mates were not nearest neighbors, and manywere separated by 3 or more territories (>1000 m). EP successwas independent of nest defense behavior, but early singingmales and males with high song rates were most successful atboth a population level and when cuckolders and cuckoldees werecompared. EP paternity contributed significantly to the opportunityfor sexual selection in kingbirds, and we suggest that thisis probably due to the low potential for WP variation in reproductivesuccess, apparent long-distance movements of one or both sexes,and consequent absence of reciprocal cuckoldry.